Alloy Bar Wear Parts

Why the alloy bar

Three reasons operators spec the alloy bar composite.

1.4× the price, 2× the life

A CA-Alloy 60 composite costs about 1.4 times a plain manganese casting and delivers about twice the wear life — the extra spend on the part comes back twice over in the chamber.

Proven, not experimental

The alloy is developed in-house for crusher duty and checked in laboratory tests and running parts. Hardness, toughness and wear life sit in the same class as a typical TiC bar composite — with test records and site cases to back it.

Any shape, any density

Moulds are 3D-printed and machined in our own workshop, and the wear bars are ours too — so bar shape, size, spacing and density follow your part, not a standard catalogue.

Our alloy bar vs a TiC alloy bar

Same bar layout, wear performance in the same class — at about three-quarters of the price.

Same layout, 75% of the price

Take a TiC composite part of the same layout as 100. Our alloy bar composite lands around 75.

Performance in the same class

58–61 HRC, bending strength around 1940 MPa, impact toughness above a typical TiC bar. In hard, abrasive duty the two parts behave in the same class.

Consistent batch to batch

Both the wear bars and the manganese matrix are controlled by the same plant, so part-to-part variation stays small — a steady chamber profile and consistent product output.

ItemTypical TiC bar / compositeCA-Alloy 60 composite
Alloy bar layoutSame patternSame pattern
Relative price, same layout100about 75
Hardness60–62 HRC58–61 HRC
Bending strength~1900 MPa1940 MPa
Impact toughness~8.1 J/cm²9.0–12.0 J/cm²
Density~6.10 g/cm³7.54 g/cm³
Hard phase in the part30–50% by weightabout 1–2.5%
Preform formRod onlyRod, block or network
MatrixHigh manganese steelHigh manganese steel

Laboratory data for the alloy itself, not field service guarantees. Patented in China (CN106282835B). Relative price compares parts of the same layout and fitment; final pricing depends on part weight, cavity and quantity.

TiC or alloy bar — how the wear face comes back

Parts returned from site service, same duty, two composite systems.

TiC / TM52 castings — uneven wear
TiC insert casting after service - uneven worn face
TiC insert casting after service - stepped wear and pits
TiC insert casting after service - irregular consumption
Uneven, stepped consumption across the working face — the insert and the matrix wear at different rates, so the profile stops matching the chamber.
CA-Alloy 60 alloy bar composite — even wear
Bowl liner after service - alloy bars consumed evenly
Ribbed liner plates after service - bar rows even
Close-up of evenly worn alloy bars
Cast into cone liners, jaw plates and roller shells — bars consumed evenly across the whole working face, no stepping and no pull-out, so the chamber profile holds deeper into the wear cycle.

Photographs of parts returned from site service. Comparison conditions vary by site; we document every trial so the result is your own number, not ours.

3D-printed patterns, machined moulds

Every mould starts life as a printed pattern, then is machined and assembled in our own workshop — process, machining and finished tooling, all in-house.

CNC machine cutting a large bowl liner mould from a printed blank
CNC machining a large bowl-liner mould from a printed blank.
Printed mould sections finished and staged for assembly
Printed mould sections, finished and staged for assembly.
CNC router printing liner patterns straight from the 3D model
Printing liner patterns straight from the 3D model.

Because tooling is made in-house this way, standard parts carry no mould charge, and a new model goes from drawing to first casting in days, not weeks.

Bar layout — dense by design

Bars are laid out to follow the wear pattern of each part. And because the bars come from our own plant, the bar itself costs little — so the layout can run far denser than a bought-in bar allows. Denser bars, more wear life.

Jaw plate mould with alloy bar arrays set in every rib
Jaw-plate mould: rod arrays set to the wear profile.
Cone crusher mould with alloy bars placed around the lining
Cone mould: bars ringed where the rock bites.
Bowl liner mould with a dense alloy bar field
Bowl-liner mould: a dense bar field across the full face.
Ribbed liner mould with a pair of bars in every rib
Ribbed liner mould: a bar pair in every rib.
Alloy bars arranged in a casting mould
Rod arrays set in the mould before pouring.
Mixed preform forms in one layout
Rod, block and network forms combined in one layout.

Cast with the bars, machined to print

After casting, parts are machined to their fitting surfaces — the bar ends finish flush with the working face, so the part bolts straight in.

Corrugated liner plates with bar ends ground flush on every rib
Corrugated liner plates: bar ends flush on every rib.
Liner bars stacked after casting
Liner castings out of one heat — batch after batch the same.
Large cone mantle machined and ready for fitting
Large cone mantle, machined and ready to fit.
Mantle working face with bar ends flush in the matrix
Mantle working face: bar ends flush with the matrix.

Customer cases

Three sites, three duty types — gold ore, iron ore and granite.

Cone crusher liner after service at a gold mine in Shandong
Gold mine, Shandong — cone crusher liner. Hard, abrasive gold ore. Liner taken off after a full service cycle: the alloy bars are consumed evenly across the whole working face, no stepped wear and no bars lost.
Cone crusher CC500 mantle in service at an iron ore mine
Iron ore mine, Zhejiang — cone crusher CC500. Medium-hard iron ore. Mantle photographed in service: the bar pattern still follows the chamber, wear is level and the profile has not stepped.
Jaw crusher dies in service at a granite mine
Granite mine, Fujian — jaw crusher dies. High-silica granite, primary crushing. Dies in service: bars worn level with the matrix, so the tooth profile stays straight and the setting holds.

Site photographs supplied by the operating mines. Duty, feed size and campaign length differ by site; we document every trial so the comparison is your own, not ours.

Check the claims yourself

40 patent filings on this technology line — 5 granted invention patents, 10 granted utility models, 22 under examination. Certificates, test reports and plant audits available on request.

40PATENT FILINGS
15GRANTED PATENTS
5000+REFERENCE IN STOCK
15000MTANNUAL CAPACITY

Frequently asked

Will the wear bars pull out under impact?They are cast in and metallurgically bonded to the matrix, then heat-treated together with the part. That is the specific failure mode this process is designed to avoid.
Will it fit my machine?Yes. It is the same casting profile made from the same patterns. The bars are added inside the same mould, so fitment is unchanged.
How much longer will it last?Field results for this class of composite typically run about 2× versus plain manganese steel in hard, high-silica ore. The exact gain depends on feed material and crusher type — we will quote a specific expectation for your site.
Is it more expensive?Roughly 30–40% over a plain manganese part, against 100%+ more wear life. Measured per tonne crushed, it usually costs less.
Can I trial it on one crusher first?Yes, and most sites do. Start with one chamber, and we will document the result the same way we document every trial.

Request a Quote